Architecture, #IA and Learning & Development deliverables are Fail
This comes across as almost pure snobbishness.
But try replacing the words ‘architectural graphic productions’ for ‘Learning & Development’ and, ‘architectural representations’ for ‘Instructional Design’ and ‘graphic’ for ‘training’ - and you have an interesting conversation starter and a fairly succinct way I feel about much of the things we ‘know’ about learning in the workplace.
And I include all the stuff we ‘know’ about ‘informal learning’ in this too.
Amplify’d from danklyn.com
You Think IA Deliverables Are Fail? Check Out This Critique of Regular-Old Architectural Deliverables
The profession generally follows a misguided interpretation of what tradition and contract jurisprudence have codified , for the purposes of billing clients and guaranteeing products and services…. [and] most of these codifications have been the outcome of some not-so-proper market-driven and technologically biased events that have disguised themselves behind the manifold masks of professional appropriateness. The depressing consequence of all this is that the current architectural graphic productions have reached an unchangeable and highly sterile phase of inert classifications and taxonomies, based on a pseudo-transparency of scope and a pseudo-scientific justification of the functions and roles carried out by the different kinds of architectural representations…
confirmations of graphic conventions that prevent any critical dispute of the most pedestrian and prosaic design protocols.Read more at danklyn.com
Leave a comment:
To post your comment, please sign in with one of the following...
